← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33422/2015disposed of

Radhakrishnan v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-11-03Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 33422 OF 2015 (C) ---------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S) :

---------------------------------------------------------------- RADHAKRISHNAN, THE CHAIRMAN, NANMA DEVELOPMENT TRUST, KANAD, EDAYANNUR P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------------------------------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: NS

WP(C).NO. 33422 OF 2015 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16.10.2015.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL / TRUE COPY / NS P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J.

....................................

W.P.(C).No.33422 of 2015(C) ............................................... Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE) AMV/03/11/