High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33441/2015disposed of

Raji. J.R v. The General Manager

2015-11-24Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33441 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- RAJI.J.R., W/O. LATE VINODKUMAR K., KRIPA APPARTMENTS, E.M. NAYANAR ROAD, GURUVAYUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, PANAMPILLY AVANUE, COCHIN - 682 036.

2. THE AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, P.M.K. TOWERS, NEAR CIVIL STATION, CALICUT - 20.

R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 33441 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED 04/08/2014 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS, SASTHAMCOTTA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, DATED 4/8/2014 EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 16/10/2015.

EXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE INCOME TAX RETURN STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER, DATED 31/03/2015 EXHIBIT-P4TRUE COPY OF THE BILL ISSUED BY THE BSNL IN THE NAME OF DECEASED VINOD KUMAR, DATED NIL RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J --------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 33441 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the widow of late Vinod Kumar. He was having a distributorship of LPG based on the contract with the 1st respondent.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to transfer the distributorship to the petitioner.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent submits that they have already directed to the petitioner to produce certain documents as per the communication dated 13/11/2015.

4. In the light of the above, if the petitioner produces necessary documents in the above communication, appropriate decision shall be taken by the 1st respondent.

W.P.(C).No. 33441 of 2015 -2Needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the entire documents from the petitioner. Till a decision is taken by the 1st respondent, the interim arrangement made by the 1st respondent will continue. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is found eligible, the dealership shall be granted to the petitioner in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr