Abdul Karim v. The Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33513 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------- ABDUL KARIM, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, PUTHUVEETTIL THOTTAPPIL, ORUMANAYOOR, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S) :
------------------------ THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR 680 003.
BY SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A., SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AMV
: 2 :
WP(C).No. 33513 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.
:
COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST.8/4921/2007.
EXHIBIT P2.
:
COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT DATED 29.10.15 VEHICLE NO.KL.49/7373 ON THE ROUTE GURUVAYUR - MULLASSERY - ENAMAVU - MANALUR EAST - KANJAN - OLARI AS ORDINARY SERVICE.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AMV
V. CHITAMBARESH, J.
....................................
W.P.(C).No.33513 of 2015(L) ............................................... Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.
2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.
3. The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE) AMV/12/11/