Mereena v. Kollam City Police Commissioner District Police Chief, Kollam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/25TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33519 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------------- MRS.MEREENA, AGED 40 YEARS W/O. YESUDAS, CHAKO DALE, NEENDAKARA P.O KOLLAM BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) SRI.P.R.MILTON RESPONDENTS :
-------------------
1. KOLLAM CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KOLLAM- 691 001
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHAVARA, CHAVARA CIRCLE OFFICE, CHAVARA KOLLAM 691 583
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHAVARA POLICE STATION, CHAVARA, KOLLAM 691 583
4. MRS. JAIN MARY, D.O. KASHMIR,MARIYANADU COLONY,KADINAMKULAM, PERUMATHURA P.O, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM 695 303, AGED 45 YEARS R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. C.R. SYAM KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 33519 of 2015 (L) -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18-10-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P1 REPRESENTATION DATED 18-10-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS UBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2(A) TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2 REPRESENTATIONS UBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 33519 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, C.J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the 4th respondent in view of the order which is being passed.
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for police protection. Petitioner's case is that the 4th respondent along with her men have trespassed into the residential house of the petitioner and are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. It is submitted that Ext.P2 complaint was submitted to the police.
3. Learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submits that, after receipt of a complaint, both the parties were called and found that certain financial transaction is there between the petitioner's husband and 4th respondent and petitioner owes some money to the 4th respondent. Learned Government Pleader further submits that the 4th
WP(C) No. 33519 of 2015 -:2:- respondent has also been summoned and police have advised the parties to get their dispute settled by approaching competent civil court.
Considering the facts of the present case and submissions made, we do not find it as a fit case to issue any direction as prayed for. The Writ Petition is closed. Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice.
A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
ttb/16/11