High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33534/2015disposed of

K K Soumya v. The State Of Kerala

2015-11-04Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33534 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K K SOUMYA, AGED 27 YEARS WIFE OF SUKESH, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT KANHIRODE SANKARA VILASAM U.P SCHOOL P.O KANHIRODE, KANNUR DIST. 670 592 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT.

GENERAL EDUCATION (P) DEPT., SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KANNUR NORTH, P.O KANNUR - 670 002 3.

THE MANAGER, KANHIRODE SANKARA VILASAM U.P SCHOOL P.O, KANHIRODE, KANNUR DIST. 670 592 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33534 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 3.6.13.

EXT.P2 COPY OF the JOINING REPORT DTD. 3.6.13 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2010-2011 DTD. 30.8.10 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVT. DTD. 12.10.15 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.33534 of 2015 - N ====================== Dated this the 4th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 revision filed before the 1st respondent. The revision is filed on 12.10.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/04/11/2015 // true copy // P.A. To Judge.