High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33645/2015disposed of

M. O. Devassy v. The District Magistrate

2015-11-09Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/18TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :

------------------

1. M. O. DEVASSY, AGED 61 YEARS S/O. OUSEPH, NALAPPA HOUSE, CHOONDAYIL P.O., VYTHIRI, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

2. ADV. P. CHATHUKUTTY, S/O. SAMY, AISWARYA, KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENTS :

---------------------

1. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, (DISTRICT COLLECTOR), WAYANAD - 670655

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MANANTHAWADY, WAYANAD - 670645

3. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, WAYANAD - 670645 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE TRIBUNAL DATED 09/07/2015. P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 07/10/2015.

P3(A):-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER AGAINST EXPLOITATION NATUREIN KANIYAMBATTA VILLAGE. P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE bp

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 33645 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 9th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached the District Collector and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mananthawady, Wayanad/2nd respondent alleging indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources and land by the party respondents. That too in violation of the order passed by the National Green Tribunal (South Zone) in original application No.201 of 2014 (SZ) 2.

This Court is of the view that urgent action shall be taken by the first respondent within three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as well as the officials of party respondents.

The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE