High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33661/2015disposed of

Anitha K. v. The Kerala State Election Commission

2015-11-11Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33661 of 2015 (G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------------- ANITHA K.

ASSISTANT MANAGER VEGETABLE & FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORADARSAN KENDRA, KAKKANAD BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PRASANTH RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD - 682030 BY SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC, K.S.E.COMMISSION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33661 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER APPOINTMENT HER AS PRESIDING OFFICER, 29-KEEZHMADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE SCAN REPORT 4/1/2014 P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE SCAN REPORT DTD 17/2/2015 P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DOCTOR AT RENAI MEDICITY DTD 2/11/2015 P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED ON 3/11/2015 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 33661 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The interim order dated 04.11.2015 passed in the writ petition reads as follows:- "Admit.

Standing Counsel Sri. Murali Purushothaman takes notice for the first respondent. Government Pleader takes notice for the second respondent. The petitioner is provisionally exempted from attending the election duties. The respondents are free to appoint a substitute.

Post on 11.11.2015."

The election is over and it is deemed that the petitioner is exempted from attending the election duties. Nothing more survives for consideration in this writ petition.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS