M. Kabeer Mooppan v. Kerala State Wakf Board

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33669 of 2015 (G) PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- M. KABEER MOOPPAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.MOOSAKUTTY MOOPPAN, RESIDING AT 'MOOPPAN MANZIL', VADAKKENADA , KAVASSERY P.O, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT (CONVENER, PUTHUKKULLY PALLI UPADESAKA RAKSHA SAMITHI).

BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI- 682 017, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.

2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, V.I.P ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI- 682 017.

3. K A YOUSAF, RETURNING OFFICER, (RETD.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF WAKF BOARD) OFFICE OF THE RETURNING OFFICER, PUDUKKULLIPALLI MAHALLU MUSLIM JUMA-ATH, COMMITTEE ELECTION CAMP, KARIPPAI, DARUL ANSARIYA P.O., THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN- 683 106. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 33669 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

--------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26/06/2015.

P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10/10/2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS BY THE PETITIONER.

P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RETURNING OFFICER. P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 26/10/2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS BY THE SECRETARY OF KOMATH PARAMBU BLOCK PUDUKKULLY PALLI MAHAL MUSLIM JUMA-ATH.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P(C).No. 33669 of 2015 Dated this the 4th November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached the third respondent by Exhibits P2 and P4. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the third respondent to pass appropriate orders on Exhibits P2 and P4 before finalisation of the voters' list.

In the above circumstances, this Court is of the view that if the voters' list is not finalised so far, Exhibits P2 and P4 shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed by the third respondent.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE vgs6/11/15