High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33904/2014dismissed as infructuous

Kesavan K.C v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-15Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33904 of 2014 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ KESAVAN K.C., AGED 60, S/O. AYYAPPAN, KURUVIKKATTU HOUSE, BALAGRAM P.O., PATTAM COLONY, KALLAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN: 685 552. BY ADVS.SRI.BIJU MARTIN SRI.M.M.SALIM SRI.D.M.NOWFAL RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA RERESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVDERNMENT ROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, R.T.OFFICE, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 553.

3. THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LTD., KATTAPPANA BRANCH, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN: 685 508.

4. THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LTD., K.K.ROAD, KANJIKUZHI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM PIN: 686 002.

R3-R4 BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN R3-R4 BY ADV. SMT.P.G.BABITHA BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVEENDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33904 of 2014 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING NO.KL-37-3940.

EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 28/2/2014 CDRF, IDUKKI. EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION 2/5/2014.

EXT. P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/5/2014. EXT. P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT DATED 20/5/2014.

EXT. P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE VERSION SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM IDUKKI DATED 2/01/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

ncd

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 33904 OF 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is reported that the dispute between the parties has since been settled. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous clarifying that the interim order is also not in force.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks