Sasidharan v. The District Police Chief, Alappuzha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33754 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------ SASIDHARAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, KODUVIRUTHI VEEDU, VAYALAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 536.

BY ADVS.SRI.SAIJU S.

SRI.JOHN JUDE ISSAC SRI.A.P.NIDHIN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S) :- -----------------

1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001.

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KUTHIYATHODU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 688 533.

3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 688 524.

4. SREEKUMAR, DEVASWOM MANAGER, THURAVUR MAHADEVAKSHESTRAM, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 524.

5. PADMANBHAMAN NAIR, ALUNKAL PARAMBU BHAVANAM, THURAVUR P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 532.

6. PRABHU, PROPRIETOR, NATIONAL CHIT FUND, THURAVUR P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 532. R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).NO.33754 OF 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- EXT.P1 :- TRUE COPY OF PETITION DTD.10.3.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.P2 :- TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DTD.16.3.2015, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT, ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.P3 :- TRUE COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S COURT-I, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33754 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for police protection alleging that respondents 4 to 6 have taken steps to remove the bunk, in which the petitioner is carrying on the business of selling of lottery tickets. It is submitted by the petitioner that the bunk has already been removed. 2.

Under such circumstances, we do not think that any direction can be given to the police for rendering police protection from unlawfully evicting or preventing the petitioner from carrying on his business in the present spot.

In the result, there being no merit in the contentions raised in the writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/6.11.2015.