Sunil v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Thrissur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33755 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------- SUNIL, AGED 43 YEARS, 7/374, MARANCHERIL HOUSE, MALA, CHALAKUDY.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S) :

------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR, PIN-680 002.

BY SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A., SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

AMV

: 2 :

WP(C).No. 33755 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1.

:

COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO KL-34/B 596. EXT.P2.

:

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF KL-34/B 596 EXT.P3.

:

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF KL-05-AA 8474.

EXT.P4.

:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT FILED ON 02.11.2015 WITH COVERING LETTER.

EXT.P5.

:

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.01.2013 IN W.P.(C) NO.1960 OF 2013.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS :

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AMV

V. CHITAMBARESH, J.

....................................

W.P.(C). No.33755 of 2015(T) ............................................... Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The vehicle covered by Ext.P1 regular permit is sought to be replaced by a later model vehicle. The same is a permissible exercise provided the vehicle is roadworthy. 2.

The above principle shall be borne in mind while considering Ext.P4 application for replacement. The respondent shall consider Ext.P4 application with notice to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE) AMV/12/11/