← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34036/2014disposed of

K.T. Kumaran v. The State Of Kerala

2015-02-06Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 34036 of 2014 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- K.T. KUMARAN, AGED 70 YEARS KINARULLA PARAMBA HOUSE, P.O.KALLUNIRA, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE VADAKARA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. F.1857 P.O.KAKATTIL, (VIA) VADAKARA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY - 673 101.

3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, VATAKARA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. F.1857 P.O.KAKKATTIL, (VIA) VADAKARA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 101.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34036 of 2014 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE DATED 13/10/2014. P1 (a) : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY PETITIONER DT. 27/10/2014. P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DECREE OF LOK ADALAT DT. 6/12/2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.34036 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has evidently not complied with the directions contained in the judgment in OP.Nos. 12265/1999, 26489/2002 and 10590/2003. The petitioner now confines his relief to the benefit under Ashwas 2015 Scheme applicable to loanees.

2. It is for the petitioner to make a motion in this regard to the second respondent Bank for its due consideration. Any motion made within the time permitted shall be dealt with by the second respondent expeditiously.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.