High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34056/2014disposed of

The Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Limited No.1874 v. The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies (General)

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 34056 of 2014 (F) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER:

-------------------------- THE NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.1874 KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOLLAM-691001.

2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOLLAM-691001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34056 of 2014 (F) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION APPEARED IN DESHABHIMANI P2:

COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION APPEARED IN JANAYUGAM. P3:

COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 7/2/2014. P4:

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/2/2014.

P5:

COPY OF CIRCULATION DETAILS GIVEN BY THE DESHABHIMANI. P6:

COPY OF CIRCULATION DETAILS GIVEN BY THE JAYANUGAM. P7:

COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17/07/2014 CLASSIFYING THE SOCIETY AS CLASS I SUPER GRADE SOCIETY WITH THE APPROVED STAFF PATTERN.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 34056 OF 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

Steps were afoot to appoint one attender, two peons and two salesman in the petitioner bank. The written tests in connection with the selection were slated on 08.02.2014 and 09.02.2014. It was at this juncture did one G. Abhilash Kumar preferred the complaint dated 05.02.2014. The first respondent has on the basis of the complaint halted the written tests by Ext. P3 order.

The copy of the complaint has allegedly not been served on the petitioner. Even the report of the second respondent dated 06.02.2014 referred to in Ext. P3 order was not served. The petitioner was also not heard before Ext. P3 interim order was passed. But then the complainant G. Abhilash Kumar is not made a party to this writ petition. 3.

Interest of justice would be met by directing the first respondent to pass final orders on this issue. The petitioner shall be served with a copy of the complaint dated 05.02.2014 and the report of the second respondent dated 06.02.2014. The petitioner as well as the complainant shall be

W.P.(C). NO. 34056 OF 2014 2 heard before final orders are passed.

The orders in this regard shall be passed within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The question of jurisdiction of the first respondent can also be raised by the petitioner in the proceedings.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE