High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33920/2015disposed of

Rughiya v. The Secretary

2015-11-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/25TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33920 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- RUGHIYA, AGED 36 YEARS W/O. FIROZ ALAVI T.V., THAZHATHU VEETTIL HOUSE P.O. O.K MURI, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S):

------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM -676 505. R BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33920 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT VIDE NO. PST 10/3814/2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 29/10/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.33920 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of her vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/16.11.2015