Saneesh A.S. v. Secretary, Rta, Ernakulam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/18TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33928 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER:
-------------------------- SANEESH A.S.
S/O. SADANANDAN, AMMUPPILLY HOUSE YOUDHAPURAM KALADY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS:
---------------------------- 1.
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM - 682 030 2.
SHIBU, S/O. VARKEY KAIPARAMPATT HOUSE ANGAMALY P.O.
ERNAKULAM - 693573 R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 33928 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 02.05.2015 EXT.P3:
A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 24.06.2015 EXT.P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 16.10.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 33928 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 09th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner contends that the second respondent is being blessed with temporary permits without any rhyme or reason. The petitioner adds that such action runs counter to Usman v. Regional Transport Authority [2015 (4) KLT 25].
2.
The petitioner has in this regard filed Ext. P4 objection with the first respondent. The same shall be considered at the time when the application for temporary permit if any put in by the second respondent is dealt with.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS