High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34275/2014dismissed as infructuous

Dr.K.Geetha v. The State Of Kerala

2015-12-16Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34275 of 2014 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------- DR.K.GEETHA, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.DR.NARENDRA VARMA, PRINCIPAL N.S.S.COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PALAKKAD -08 BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENTS:

------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 004.

3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD 678 001.

4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD 678 001.

5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HEMAMBIKA NAGAR, PALAKKAD 678 001.

6. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HEMAMBIKA NAGAR POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD 678 001

7. NANDAKUMAR PWD CONTRACTOR, HAREKRISHNA, PAREKKUNNAM PALAKKAD 678 001

8. ACHUTHAN TREASURER, CITU DISTRICT COMMITTEE, PALAKKAD 678 001.

9. BALAN LOCAL COMMITTE MEMBER, AKATHETHARA LOCAL COMMITTEE COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA(MARXIST), AKATHETHARA PALAKKAD-8

10. PRABHAKARAN, ITTINGAPARAMBU COLONY, AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD-8.

11. BABU ITTINGAPARAMBU COLONY, AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD-8. R8-R11 BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ. & K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

.................................................. W.P.(C).No.34275 of 2014 ....................................................... Dated this the 16th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, CJ.

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that police protection was sought for, for completing the painting work in the college buildings through painters and this Court also passed an interim order on 17th December, 2014 and by lapse of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

cl /true copy/ P.S to Judge