← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34096/2015disposed of

K.V.Sabu v. The Secretary

2015-11-113 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34096 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------- 1.

K.V.SABU, AGED 45 YEARS, KODUVATHARA HOUSE, PADIVATTOM, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., ERNAKULAM (WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 7/AJ 227). 2.

V.A.MUHAMMED SADIQUE, VADAPPILLY HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA P.O., ALUVA ERNAKULAM (WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 41/C/1299). BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S) :

------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY/REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ERNAKULAM-682 030.

BY SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A., SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

AMV

: 2 :

WP(C).No. 34096 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- P1.

:

COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIOENR'S ON THE ROUTE ALUVA-THOPPUMPADY VIA PADMA ETC, WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL7/AJ 227 DATED 12/10/2015.

P2.

:

COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIOENR'S ON THE ROUTE ALUVA-ILLICHODE VIA PADMA THOPPUMPADY ETC, WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 41/C 1299 OF DATED 12/10/2015. P3.

:

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8/5/2015 IN WPC NO.13863/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AMV

V. CHITAMBARESH, J.

....................................

W.P.(C).No.34096 of 2015(J) ............................................... Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners confine their relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of their stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioners as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE) AMV/12/11/