High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34106/2015disposed of

Neoplast Industries v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board

2015-11-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34106 of 2015 (K) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------- NEOPLAST INDUSTRIES, KOOVAPPADY P.O., THODAPARAMBU, PERUMBAVOOR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.V.D.VINOD. BY ADVS.SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL RESPONDENT(S) :

---------------------------- KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE (ERNAKULAM-II), 1ST FLOOR, MANNA RESIDENCY, M.C.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR-683 542. BY ADV. SRI. M.AJAY, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 34106 of 2015 (K) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

COPY OF CONSENT DATED 11/12/2006 GRANTED BY THE RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF CONSENT MADE BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 08/07/2015. EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 07/07/2015 FOR RS.10,840 OF IDBI BANK PERUMBAVOOR BRANCH.

EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 31/03/2015 FOR RS.8,760/- BANK OF BARODA, PERUMBVOOR BRANCH. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34106 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner applied for renewal of consent to operate the Unit. The petitioner submits that the inspection was conducted on 22.7.2015. The petitioner approached this Court for seeking an early disposal of Ext.P2 application by the respondent. Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the respondent to conclude the proceedings relating to the renewal application within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken as above, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner for want of renewal of consent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln