High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34139/2015disposed of

K. Raveendran v. The Secretary, General Education Department

2015-11-12Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34139 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 58 YEARS MANAGER, KUYITHERI M.L.P SCHOOL P.O BHUMIVATHUKKAL KALLAYI, VALAYAM - 673 517 KOZHIKODE BY ADVS.SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.) SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.N.DEEPA RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF KERALA, GOVT. SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER NADAPURAM 673 517 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34139 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 7.8.12 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DTD. 29.4.14.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 14.7.11 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 9.7.14 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.34139 of 2015 - N ====================== Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 revision filed before the 1st respondent. The revision is filed on 09.07.2014.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/12/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.