High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34187/2015disposed of

Sheela S v. The Addl.Chief Secretary To Government

2015-11-12Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34187 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SHEELA S., W/O M. RAJESH KUMAR CONFIDENTIAL ASSISTANT L.B.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR WOMEN POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RESIDING AT MINI HOME T.C. 33/963, VETUKADU, BEACH P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 07 BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE ADDL.CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE L.B.S CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY THE MEMEBER SECRETARY 695 001.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL R BY SMT.K.K.RAZIYA, SC, LBS CENTRE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34187 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE CHART SHOWING THE DISCREPANCIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 3.12.14 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.34187 of 2015 - W ====================== Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P2 representation filed before the 1st respondent. The representation is filed on 03.12.2014.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/12/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.