Dharmaraj Bhosale v. The State Police Chief
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/8TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 34464 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------ DHARMARAJ BHOSALE, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. GANGADHAR BHOSLE, SURAJ BHAVAN, VARIKKUZHIYIL THAZHAM, KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS:
-------------
1. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
2. THE CITY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANNIYANKARA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 016.
R1-R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.S.HYMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 34464 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
----------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/09/2014 IN W.P(C) 21545/2014 EXHIBIT-P2- COPY OF THE SUMMONS ISUSED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, KOZHIKODE DATED 12/11/2014.
EXHIBIT-P3- COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CARD ISSUED FROM THE TALUK HOSPITAL, THAMARASSERY DATED 21/11/2014.
EXHIBIT-P4- COPY OF THE TREATMENT DETAILS GIVEN FROM THE GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE DATED 24/11/2014. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS --------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab
P.UBAID, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.34464 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of February, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Grievance of the writ petitioner herein is that the police has not taken any action on his complaint of brutal assault in custody, against some officers of the Enforcement Department. Now there is a report from the police that the police has already registered a crime on the petitioner's complaint as Crime No.50/2015 of the Panniyankara Police Station under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code, and that investigation is going on. Thus the grievance of the writ petitioner stands redressed. He is satisfied, and let the investigation proceed. In view of the report made by the police this writ petition can be closed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.
P.UBAID JUDGE ab