Biju N.M v. The Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34293 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- BIJU N.M AGED 40 YEARS NELLIKKAKUDY, KELAKAM, THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670674 BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VATAKARA 673 101

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA 673 101

3. MS. BILU, SREEVALSAM, ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE 673 303 R1-R2 BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34293 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER, KL 58 E 3283 P2:COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 02.08.2014 P3:COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 04.12.2014 P4:COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07.07.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 34293 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P4 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit. 2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks