Roby K.Thoppil v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/22ND KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34354 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- ROBY K.THOPPIL W/O. JIJU MANI, THOPPIL HOUSE, MALLAPPALLY WEST P.O. MALLAPPALLY-689 585.(HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH) CMS HIGH SCHOOL, KUMPLAMPOIKA).
BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER MAVELIKKARA.
4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER CMS SCHOOLS, CSI DIOCESAN OFFICE, CATHEDRAL ROAD KOTTAYAM.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMTM.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 34354 of 2015 (T) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :
COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD.27.7.2009. EXT.P2 :
COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.15.4.2008 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1.
EXT.P3 :
COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING GO(P) NO.104/08/G.EDN. DTD.10.6.2008.
EXT.P4 :
COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD.19.6.2009 ISSUED AND APPROVED BY THE EDUCATIONAL OFFICER.
EXT.P5 :
COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD.18.7.2007 ISSUED BY THE EDUCATIONAL OFFICER.
EXT.P6 :
COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDERS BEARING GO(RT) NO.5725/2014/G.EDN. DTD.26.12.2014.
EXT.P7 :
COPY OF THE GO(RT)NO.5704/2014/G.EDN. DTD.24.12.2014. EXT.P8 :
COPY OF THE STATUTORY REVISION PETITION DTD.15.9.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.1.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.34354 of 2015 - T ====================== Dated this the 13th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P8 revision filed before the 1st respondent. The revision is filed on 15.09.2015..
2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/13/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.