High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34527/2015disposed of

Mini E.V v. M.D., Kerala Water Authority, Thiruvananthapuram

2015-11-17Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34527 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- MINI E.V UPPER DIVISION TYPIST, PROJECT DIVISION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY PIRAVOM ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 664 BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH RESPONDENT :

---------------------------- MANANGING DIRECTOR KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033 R BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34527 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO. KWA/HO/E.10-1297/2009 DT. 15/1/2009 OF THE RESPONDENT EXT.P2 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO. KWA/CE/CR/KOCHI/E2-687/2002 DT. 8/10-052012 OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (CR) EXT.P3 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO. KWA/HO/E-10/6880/2006 VOL. II DT. 8/11/2012 OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (GL) EXT.P4 : PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 13/2/2015 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34527 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 representation filed before the respondent. The representation is filed on 13.02.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before him and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE AV/17/11