High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34567/2015disposed of

George C.A v. The District Collector

2015-11-17Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34567 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- GEORGE C.A, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.ALPHONSE, CHOOLACKAL HOUSE, CHINNAKANAL P.O. MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN SMT.NEENU PAVITHRAN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT-68555.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685554.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK-685554.

BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUSHEELA BHATT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34567 of 2015 (U) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA NO.LA. 218/93 DATED 20.10.1994 ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), RAJAKUMARY EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED SKETCH DATED 2.2.1999 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, RAJAKUMARY EXT.P-3:

TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT NO.3678878 DATED 26.2.2002 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKANAL EXT.P-4:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.10.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34567 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court on account of nonacceptance of basic tax from him in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.40/6 of Chinnakanal Village. The petitioner refers title as LA 218/93 issued by the Special Tahsildar, Ernakulam. The petitioner made representation as per Ext.P4 before the Tahsildar.

This Court is of the view that appropriate decision shall be taken on Ext.P4 by the Tahsildar after hearing the petitioner and adverting to the title deed claimed by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Depend upon the outcome of such decision, basic tax can be accepted.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln