High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34572/2015disposed of

Vathsala v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Kollam

2015-11-17Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34572 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- VATHSALA, LATHA MANDIRAM, AVANEESWARAM P.O., THALAVOOR, KOLLAM - 691 517.

BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM - 691 001.

2. THAHSILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 506.

3. ASSISTNAT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION PATHANAPURAM, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTNAT ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION, PATHANAPURAM - 689 695.

4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION PUNALUR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION, PUNALUR - 691 305.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 34572 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - A ROUGH SKETCH SHOWING THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND THE POSITION OF THE PETITIONER'S SHOP.

P2 - THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING ILLEGAL ENCROACHMENT MADE ON THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY BY THE PRIVATE PROPETY OWNERS. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 15.9.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34572 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner obtained financial assistance under the Integrated Rural Development Program for establishing a Bunk shop. The petitioner claims that she is a senior citizen and now she is threatened with eviction. The petitioner approached the Revenue Divisional Officer by Ext.P3, permitting her to continue with operation of the bunk.

Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 after hearing the petitioner as well as the officials of the Integrated Rural Development Program within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken in this matter, status quo shall be maintained.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln