High Court of KeralaWP(C)/38693/2010dismissed for default

Nadirshaw v. Excise Inspector

2015-09-14Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/23RD BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38693 of 2010 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------------- NADIRSHAW, S/O.ISMAIL, AGED 29 YEARS, PARACKAL HOUSE, KADASSIKKADAVU KARA, ANAKKARA VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDY JOSEPH RESPONDENTS:

----------------

1. EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KATTAPPANA - 685 508.

2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, IDUKKI - 685 603.

3. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER, EXCISE HEAD QUARTERS, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

4. EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, EXCISE HEAD QUARTERS, NANDAVANAM, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

R,R1-4 BY ADV. SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 38693 of 2010 (J) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of September, 2015.

JUDGMENT

None appears for the petitioner. Despite the fact that the writ petition belongs to the year 2010 and that well in advance this Court has notified that the matter would be taken up today, the petitioner has not chosen to appear before the Court to pursue the case. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioner may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

rv /True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

W.P.(C). No.

-2-