High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34897/2015disposed of

Sivasankara Pillai v. The Director

2015-11-19Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34897 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- SIVASANKARA PILLAI, PADMAVILASAM, SOORANADU.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR, LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, HANUMANKOVIL ROAD, P.M.G. JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010

3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 34897 of 2015 (J) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED ON 27/12/14 BY ASSISTANT CONTROLLER, LEGAL METORLOGY, PATHANAMTHITTA.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 26/3/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34897 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the first respondent by Ext.P2 alleging imposition of fine of Rs.5,000/- by the Assistant Controller, Legal Metrology, Flying Squad, Pathanamthitta. According to the petitioner, the fine imposed was illegal.

In view of the fact that Ext.P2 is pending before the first respondent, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the same within two months after issuing notice to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln