← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34900/2015disposed of

Muhammedkutty v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-19Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------------- MUHAMMEDKUTTY AGED 74 YEARS S/O. HASSAN KULAPPURATH VEETTIL CHELAKKARA VILLAGE THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA SMT.VINAYA V.NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

CHELAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY CHELAKKAR THRISSUR - 680 586 3.

OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 4.

SHEEBA, D/O. VARUTHAPPAN CHITTILAPPILLY VEETTIL CHELAKKARA THRISSUR - 680 586

5.

SHIBU S/O. VARUTHAPPAN CHITTILAPPILLY VEETTIL CHELAKKARA THRISSUR - 680 586 6.

BEEPATHUMMA D/O. MANU RAWTHER KULATHINGAL HOUSE CHELAKKARA THRISSUR - 680 586 R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 14.12.2009 OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9.4.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF DECISION DATED 4.6.2014 TAKEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 14.10.2014 IN W.P.(C). NO. 8987/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 34900 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his reliefs to an early consideration of O.P.No. 1111/2014 pending on the file of the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Department. It is for the petitioner to move appropriate application in O.P.No. 1111/2014 to advance the hearing and have the case disposed of early. I am sure that any such application if moved shall be considered to have an expeditious termination of the proceedings.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS