K.V.Shaju v. The Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/19TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 35163 of 2014 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------- K.V.SHAJU AGED 42 YEARS S/O. KUNJUMON, RESIDING AT THOUFEEQUE MANZIL MONASTRY LANE, ALUVA.
BY ADV. SRI.SABU THOZHUPPADAN RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------
1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ERNAKULAM(RURAL), ALUVA- 682 035.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA- 682 035.
3. M/S. SAKTHI FINANCE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, (OPERATION) 62 DR. NANJAPPA ROAD, COIMBATORE-641018.
4. BEENA VINJAYA CHANDRAKURUP, W/O. VIJAYACHANDRAKURUP, THEKKEKARATH HOUSE, KALLINEL MAVELIKKARA.P.O., ALAPPUZHA-690101.
R1 & 2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 35163 of 2014 (U) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1. - TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM STATEMENT IN A.C. NO. 38/2014 OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AT COIMBATORE.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 35163 of 2014 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of January, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice need be issued to respondents 3 and 4 in view of the order which is being passed.
2. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner alleging police harassment, seeking a direction to the first and second respondents to abstain from entertaining complaints relating to civil disputes in respect of hire purchase agreement in between the petitioner, third respondent and the fourth respondent.
3. Learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submits that a complaint was received from the fourth respondent with regard to which both the petitioner and the third respondent were called. The petitioner did not appear at the police station and the statement of fourth respondent has been recorded. It is further submitted that police having found that dispute is of civil
WP(C).No.35163/14 nature, has not proceeded any further nor any crime has been registered.
In view of the above, we do not find any case of police harassment. The writ petition is closed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
sou.