Ashokkumar v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34947 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------- ASHOKKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARA PILLAI, IRAMPALLY RAMYABHAVAN, AZHIYIDATHUCHIRA MURI, KAVUMBHAGOM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA - 689101.
2. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER/CONVENER OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, KRISHI BHAVAN, PERINGARA - 689 108.
3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KAVUMBHAGOM - 689 102.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 34947 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DOCUMENT NO. 1816/2015 DT. 10.7.2015 REGISTERED IN SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THIRUVALLA. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LAND.
P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 2.11.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34947 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner approached the first respondent under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967(for short, the 'Order'). 2.
The petitioner's case is that his land is a converted land much before the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 ( for short, the "Act 28/2008"). In view of the claim of the petitioner, the case shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Order by the first respondent, after verifying the draft data bank to find out whether the property of the petitioner is a paddy or wet land under the Act 28/2008. If the land is not classified as above, necessarily, the application of the petitioner shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Order for utilizing other purpose. Needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after issuing notice to the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln