High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34949/2015disposed of

K.C.Luckose v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-11-19Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34949 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- K.C.LUCKOSE, S/O. K.J.CHACKO, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, PERUNNA KIZHAKKU P.O., CHANGANASSERRY.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA - 689 101.

2. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER/ CONVENER OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, KRISHI BHAVAN, PERINGARA - 689 108.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KAVUMBHAGOM 689 102.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 34949 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DOCUMENT NO.131/1/2012 DATED 11.01.2012 REGISTERED IN SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THIRUVALLA. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LAND. P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.11.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.34949 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the first respondent under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967(for short, the 'Order'). 2.

The petitioner's case is that his land is a converted land much before the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 ( for short, the "Act 28/2008"). In view of the claim of the petitioner, the case shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Order by the first respondent, after verifying the draft data bank to find out whether the property of the petitioner is a paddy or wet land under the Act 28/2008. If the land is not classified as above, necessarily, the application of the petitioner shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Order for utilizing other purpose. Needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after issuing notice to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln