High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34995/2015disposed of

Manager, Aup School v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-19Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 34995 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ P.K.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 73 YEARS S/O. LATE P. KARUPPAN MANAGER, AUP SCHOOL MANNUR POST, PALAKKAD, RESIDING AT SANTHI NIVAS, MANNUR P.O.

PALAKKAD - 678 642.

BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PALAKKAD - 678 001.

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PARALI, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34995 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S' EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------ EXT. P1 - COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 02.06.2014 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT. P1(A) - COPY OF STAFF FIXATION PROCEEDINGS DATED 30.09.2010 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXT. P2 - COPY OF ORDER OF 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.06.2014. EXT. P3 - COPY OF ORDER OF 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 29.01.2015. EXT. P4 - COPY OF PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 29.05.2015.

EXT. P5 - COPY OF REVISION PETITION DATED 17.06.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.34995 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P5 Revision Petition pending before the second respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 within a reasonable period. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 petition, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the second respondent will consider in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp/23/11/15