← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35061/2015disposed of

K.G.Natarajan v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Cum Regional Transport Officer

2015-11-20Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35061 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------- 1.

K.G.NATARAJAN, AGED 62 YEARS KALOMKOVILAKAM, THIRUNELLUR, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA (WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 32/G 7174) 2.

K.G.RENJITH, KALOMKOVILAKAM, THIRUNELLUR, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA (WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 4/P 3339) BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.

R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.35061 of 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST PETITIONER'S TIMING WITH ITS VEHICLE NO.KL 32/G 7174 EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND PETITIONER'S TIMINGS WITH ITS VEHICLE NO.KL 4/P 3339 DATED 26.11.1997 EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER'S SERVICE ON THE ROUTE POOCHAKKALERNAKULAM DATED 26.10.2015. EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER'S SERVICE ON THE ROUTE POOCHAKKALERNAKULAM WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 4/P 3339 EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.11.2015 IN WP.(C) NO.34012/2015.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.35061 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners confine their relief to an early consideration of Exts.P3 and P4 representations filed to revise the timings of the operation of their stage carriage services on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P4 representations and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioners as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj./20.11.15