High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35096/2015disposed of

K.Surendran v. Chithara Gramma Panchayat

2015-11-20Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35096 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

---------------- K.SURENDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS S/O.KUNCHU, RESHMA BUILDING, MULLIKKADU CHITHARA, KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

-------------------

1. CHITHARA GRAMMA PANCHAYAT, CHITHARA.P.O, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-691559.

2. SECRETARY, CHITHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHITHARA.P.O KOLLAM-691559.

3. NOUSHAD, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, PUTHENVEETTIL, CHITHARA.P.O CHITHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PIN-691559.

4. ABDUL KARIM, S/O.ABDUL RASACK, CHITHARA.P.O, PUTHENVEETTIL CHITHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PIN-691559.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35096 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07.08.2015. P2 RECEIPT DATED 7/8/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.35096 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation pending with the second respondent. The same pertains to the alleged unauthorised construction by respondents 3 and 4 in violation of the provisions of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act.

2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition and the judgment before the second respondent for compliance.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/20.11.15