V.C.Pardhan v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35151 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- V.C.PARDHAN AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. V.K. CHELLAPPAN, PRINCIPAL, A.B. VILASAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MUHAMMA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR SMT.K.REMADEVI RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

3.

THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001.

4.

THE MANAGER, A.B. VILASAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MUHAMMA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 525.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35151 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 22.01.2006 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPNDENT DATED 20.02.2007 P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.6.2015 P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATED 19.10.2015 P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF HSST P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF FIXATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 6.10.2009 P8:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.11.2015 WITHOUT ANNEXURES RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 35151 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P8 revision dated 13.11.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 20/11/15