Venu v. Circle Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35169 of 2015 (U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
1. VENU, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN AHSARI, SHIVA PRIYA, T.C.11/1268, KAILAS NAGAR, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHPAURAM.
2. DHANYA V.R., AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.VENU, SHIVA PRIYA, T.C.11/1268, KAILAS NAGAR, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHPAURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN SMT.M.SANTHI (K/868/2011) SRI.RAHUL MATHEW SMT.REMA DEVI RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANNATHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. C.BABU, S/O.CHELLAPPANIKKAR, RUGMINI NIVAS, VILAVOORKKAL VILLAGE, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM DISTRICT - 695 572.
R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 35169 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT MADE BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.6.2015 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.
& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
================ W.P. (C) No. 35169 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 25th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, C.J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the 2nd respondent in view of the judgment which is being passed. 2.
Petitioners have filed this writ petition alleging police harassment. Petitioners' case is that petitioners have been unnecessarily summoned at the Police Station with regard to a civil dispute between the 2nd respondent and the second petitioner's husband.
3.
Learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submits that on a complaint received from a third person, first petitioner was called to come to the Police Station. First petitioner did not appear as directed by the police. However, the complainant appeared and his submissions were recorded on 12th November, 2015. Police after recording the statement
W.P(C) No.35169/15 -:2:- decided to close the matter, there being civil dispute between the parties. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that complaint has already been closed. We do not find any kind of police harassment in this case.
Writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp25/11/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge