← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35178/2015disposed of

P.A.Joseph v. Kerala State Electricity Board Limited

2015-11-21Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN SATURDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/30TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35178 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ P.A.JOSEPH, AGED 48 YEARS SENIOR ASSISTANT/SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED ETTUMANOOR.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAVINDRA NATH SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD SRI.IMAM GRIGORIOS KARAT RESPONDENTS:

---------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER VAIKOM DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED VAIKOM P.O., PIN-686 141.

BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35178 of 2015 (V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- ----------------------------------- EXT.P1 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2015.

EXT.P2 - COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 08.09.2015.

EXT.P3 - COPY OF THE SUBMISSION DATED 28.09.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.35178 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of November, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P2 application pending before the second respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 within a reasonable period. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 application of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the second respondent will consider in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp/23/11/15