High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35272/2015disposed of

C.K. Jyothiraj v. The Secretary Regional Transport Authority Alappuzha

2015-11-214 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN SATURDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/30TH KARTHIKA, WP(C).No. 35272 of 2015 (H) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

------------- C.K. JYOTHIRAJ, SON OF KUNJUKUTTAN, SANDHYA NIVAS, CMC 18 CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (TR) RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY. ALAPPUZHA-688001.

2. C.K. AJITH, JYOTHI BHAVAN, CMC 18, CHERTHALA P.O.M, PIN 688524 ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC. 35272 OF 2015.

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS:

EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 12.11.2015 FILED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OPERATED WITH VEHICLE NO.KL04-K-9155 ON THE ROUTE MUHAMMA-CHERTHALA. EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OPERATED WITH VEHICLE NO. KL 04-32B/6276 ON THE ROUTE CHERTHALA- VELIYAMPRA TEMPLE. EXT. P3a : TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE OF VEHICLE KL/32B6276. EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OPERATED WITH VEHICLE NO.KL 17B 9666 ON THE ROUTE PALLITHODE-MUHAMMA JETTY. EXT. P4a : TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE OF VEHICLE KL 17B 9666.

EXT. P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED NIL FILED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P5a : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 16.11.2015.

P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 35272 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of November, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to take up, consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 objection said to have been filed by the petitioner before the said authority.

2. The matter relates to the grant of temporary permit. As of now, the second respondent is operating on the route as per the temporary permit issued by the authority, against which the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 objection.

3. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, the first respondent is directed to take up and dispose of Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one week from today.

W.P.(C)s. 35272/2015.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

P. BHAVADASAN, sb.

JUDGE