High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35529/2014dismissed

P.P.Dineshan v. The Secretary, The Regional Transport Authority, Vatakara

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 35529 of 2014 (M) ----------------------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------------------------------------------------- P.P.DINESHAN, AGED 49 YEARS, GOVINDA BHAVAN, CHOVVA, KANNUR.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA-673 101. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 35529 of 2014 (M) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT WITH CHELAN. EXHIBIT-P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 22/12/2014.

EXHIBIT-P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.471 OF 2014 DATED 08/02/2014 ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 35529 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 16th January, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks renewal of the permit which expired on 14.07.2011. The petitioner also seeks replacement in the said permit and pending those applications, seeks issuance of a temporary permit. It is to be noticed that, the permit itself was for operation of a Super Fast Service which is not, at present, permitted since the same is restricted to State Transport undertaking. Further, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that there is huge tax arrears and the vehicle which was endorsed in permit, is now in Gform. For all the above reasons, the writ petition is found to be devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs