M.Thrivikraman Namboothiri v. The Travancore Devaswom Board

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35387 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- M.THRIVIKRAMAN NAMBOOTHIRI S/O NARAYANAN NAMBOOTHIRI MOOTHEDATHU MANA, THRIVALOOR, ALANGADU PO ALUVA, (MELSANTHI, THIRUVALOOR DEVASWOM THIRUVALOOR) BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD DEVASWOM BUILDINGS, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRTARY 2.

THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER DEVASWOM BUILDINGS, NANDHANCODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

3.

ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICER OF THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, PARAVOOR GROUP P.N.SREEKUMAR, SANTHI, MARKANDESWARAM DEVASWOM MANNAM PO, NORTH PARAVOOR R BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35387 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DTD. 14.2.05 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 25.2.15 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.3 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 14.7.15 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 4.8.15 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P5 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 9.9.15 SUBMITTED TO RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P6 COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST EXT.P4 ORDER TO THE EXTENT THE SAME RELATES TO RESPONDENT NO.4.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.35387 of 2015 - W ====================== Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P6 appeal filed before the 1st respondent. The appeal is filed on 06.10.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the appeal filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/23/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.