Ameya Anirudh v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35542 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- AMEYA ANIRUDH (MINOR), AGED 15 YEARS, STUDYING AT STD X, ST.TERESAS ANGLO INDIAN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER ANIRUDHAN P.V., AGED 55 YEARS, S/O LATE N.K. BHARATHAN, KURUVA, KANNUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SRI.M.A.AHAMMAD SAHEER RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. THE CONVENER, KANNUR NORTH SUB DISTRICT LEVEL SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, KANNUR, PIN:670 001.
3. ST.TERESA'S ANGLO INDIAN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KANNUR PIN:670 013, REPRESENTED BY ITS HEADMISTRESS. R1 & 2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
WP(C).No. 35542 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE IN SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM DATED 4.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE IN SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM DATED 28.9.2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.35542 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 24th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is a student of the third respondent's school. The petitioner seeks a direction to permit her to participate in the item instrumental music - Veena in the Kannur North Sub District Level School Kalolsavam.
It is to be noted that the petitioner has not been selected at the school level. If the petitioner is allowed to be participated, it would definitely affect the candidature of other students. Further, this Court need not interfere in such matters and in that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln