← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35716/2015disposed of

Manoj K.D v. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd

2015-11-26Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35716 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- MANOJ K.D AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE U. DIVAKARAN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, K.S.E.B. LTD., CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 307. KURUVATH HOUSE, "NANDANAM", GREEN FIELD, P.O. MANNUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 651 BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENTS:

------------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION), REGD. OFFICE: VAIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.

2.

THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., REGD. OFFICE: VAIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.

3.

THE SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., REGD. FFICE: VAIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.

BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35716 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER BO(FB) NO.395/20122 (ESTT/CR - RULES/2006) DATED 18.02.2012 EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01.01.2014 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF ANOTHER REPRESENTATION DATED 29.01.2015 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 35716 of 2015 (L) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3 representation dated 29.01.2015 has not been considered till date by the 3rd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 3rd respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 26 /11/15