K.Lasitha v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35838 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- K.LASITHA AGED 32 YEARS W/O. P. SUBODHAN, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS), KADACHIRA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. KADACHIRA, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, RERESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.

3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR, P.O. KANNUR 670 002.

4.

THE MANAGER, KADACHIRA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. KADACHIRA, KANNUR DISTRICT 670 621.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35838 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITONER DATED 8.10.2012 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DATED 29.06.2015 P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.07.2015 P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DATED 01.09.2014 P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DATED 28.05.2015 P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 5.7.2014 P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.5310/2014/G.EDN. DATED 28.11.2014 OF THE GOVERNMENT P8:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 21.7.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 35838 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3 revision dated 11.07.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 26/11/15