← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35871/2015disposed of

Rajendran Nair v. Authorised Officer

2015-11-27Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35871 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- RAJENDRAN NAIR, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 53 YEARS, PANICKRAZHIKATH DEVIMANDIRAM, CHERUMANGADU, PUTHOOR. P.O., KOLLAM-691 507.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR), SRI.M.SURESH KUMAR.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. AUTHORISED OFFICER, CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK, KOTTARAKKARA, PUTHOOR BRANCH, PUTHOOR, KOLLAM-691 507.

2. CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK, KOTTARAKKARA, PUTHOOR BRANCH, KOLLAM-691 507, REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER.

BY ADV. SMT.DEEPA.V., SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 35871 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19/15.

EXT.P2.

TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 13-11-2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.35871 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of November 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who had availed a loan from the respondent bank, defaulted in repayment of the same. Consequently, the respondent bank initiated proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as the 'SARFAESI Act', to recover the loan amounts. Ext.P2 is the notice issued by the Advocate Commissioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner impugns the steps initiated by the respondent bank for recovery of the loan amounts.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that the sole prayer of the petitioner is to permit him to remit the balance amounts outstanding to the bank in easy installments. Taking into

W.P.(c).No.35871 of 2015 : 2 :

account the plea of financial hardship raised by the petitioner, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:- (i) The total overdue amount, in respect of the loan, is stated to be Rs.1,45,000/- together with accrued interest. Accordingly, if the petitioner remits the aforesaid amount of Rs.1,45,000/- together with accrued interest in six equal and successive monthly installments commencing from 15.12.2015, and continues to keep up the regular installment payments as per the original loan schedule, then the recovery steps initiated against him by the respondent bank shall be kept in abeyance.

(ii)It is made clear that if the petitioner commits a default in respect of any of the installments, he will lose the benefit of this judgment and the respondent bank will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against him from the stage at which they presently stand.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE sm/