Bindhu v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(Crl.).No. 523 of 2014 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- BINDU MADANAN AGED 45 YEARS W/O.MADANAN, MANGALATH HOUSE, VADUTHALA ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 023 NOW RESIDING AT KANICHUKUNNATH (H), NARAKKAL ERNAKULAM 682 505.
BY ADVS.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.B.R.MURALEEDHARAN SRI.K.K.VINOD SRI.K.V.SURESH RESPONDENT(S/RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY C.I.OF POLICE ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 018.
2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOCHI CITY, ERMNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 011.
3. SIBI KUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS HOUSE NO.33/1965, PERANDOOR, ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 024.
4. SUDHA SIBI KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS HOUSE NO..33/1965, PERANDOOR, ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 024
5. K.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O.KUNJUKUTTY, VALAYIL HOUSE, KARUNAGAPPAILLY KOLLAM
6. RAJESWARAY RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 60 YEARS W/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, VALAYIL HOUSE, KARUNAGAPPILLY KOLLAM R1& 2 BY ADV. SMT. KOCHUMOL KADAVATH - GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl.).No. 523 of 2014 (S) ----------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXHIBIT P1 MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY DR.SREERAM PRASAD CONSULTANT NEUROLOGIST, LOURDES HOSPITAL,ERNAKULAM DATED 15/12/2014 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE IST RESPONDENT DATED 20/10/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS -------------------------:
NIL.
TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE.
acd
V.K. MOHANAN & P.D. RAJAN, JJ.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl) No.523 of 2014 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
V.K.Mohanan,J.
After hearing the matter to certain extent and particularly in the light of the statement filed by the District Police Chief, Kochi City, (2nd respondent), the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing this writ petition.
The above submission is recorded. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, it is clarified that dismissal of the above writ petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner to work out her legal remedy.
V.K. MOHANAN, JUDGE.
P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.
acd