← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35894/2015disposed of

Khaleel v. The State Of Kerala

2015-11-27Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35894 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- KHALEEL, AGED 34 YEARS S/O MAYANKUTTY OFFICE ASSISTANT VALLIADU, VILLIAPPALY VATAKARA THALUK KOZHIKODE DIST.-673 101 BY ADVS.SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL SRI.P.S.BINU RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 3.

DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DIST. 673 101 4.

ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THODANNUR, VATAKARA THALUK KOZHIKODE - 673 108 5.

MANAGER, VALLIADU U.P. SCHOOL VALLIADU, VILLIAPPALY VATAKARA THALUK KOZHIKODE DIST. - 673 542 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35894 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT DTD. 31.03.14 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER OF 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 22.5.15 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD. 27.7.15 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.35894 of 2015 - J ====================== Dated this the 27th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 revision filed before the 1st respondent. The revision is filed on 27.07.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/27/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.