High Court of KeralaWP(C)/35904/2015disposed of

P.K.Kharim v. Kerala State Warehousing Corporation

2015-11-27Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 35904 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- P.K.KHARIM, SENIOR ASSISTANT STATE WAREHOUSE, MUTHALAMADA PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 016 2.

THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 016.

R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35904 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.KSWC/ADMN/DA191/2014-15 DTD.20.5.14 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES DTD. 10.6.14 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REPLY DTD. 5.7.14 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.KSWC/ADMN/DA-199/2014-15 DTD.107.14 EXT.P5 COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DTD. NIL EXT.P6 COPY OF THE TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DTD. 1.4.15 EXT.P7 COPY OF THE REPLY DTD. 20.4.15 EXT.P8 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.KSCW/ADMN/DA-199/PKK/201516 DTD. 10.6.15 EXTP9 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.KSWC/EST/T&P/SA/2015-16 DTD. 15.9.15 EXT.P10 COPY OF THE APPEAL DTD. 16.7.15 FILED BY PETITIONERS EXT.P11 COPY OF THE LETTER NO.KSWC/EST/PF/PKK/2015-16 DTD. 5.10.15 EXT.P12 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 31756/205 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.35904 of 2015 - K ====================== Dated this the 27th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P10 appeal filed before the 2nd respondent. The appeal is filed on 16.07.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 2nd respondent definitely will have to look at the appeal filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/27/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.