← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36005/2015disposed of

Hussain v. Valanchery Municipality

2015-12-094 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36005 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- HUSSAIN AGED 34 YEARS D/O.MUHAMMED KUTTY, PALARA HOUSE, VALANCHERY PO TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. VALANCHERY MUNICIPALITY VALANCHERY PO, MALAPPURAM-676 552 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE SECRETARY VALANCHERY MUNICIPALITY, VALANCHERY PO MALAPPURAM-676 552.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 36005 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE GIFT DEED.

P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER OF KATTIPARUTHI VILLAGE ON 2-11-2015.

P3 : PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KATTIPARUTHY DT 11-11-2014.

P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- nil TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

K.HARILAL, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 36005 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner in possession of 10 cents of property in Sy No.82/2 of Kattiparuthy Village of Tirur Taluk in Malappuram district. According to the petitioner, the said land at present is a dry land, which was reclaimed long years back and the said property is not included in the data bank as paddy field. So he filed Ext.P5 application seeking building permit to construct a residential building. The grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P5 has not been considered so far, despite a long lapse of time.

2.

Having regard to the grievance projected in this writ petition, the respondents are directed to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

K.HARILAL, JUDGE sks