← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36064/2015disposed of

Bus Operators Organisation v. Regional Transport Authority

2015-11-30Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36064 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------- 1.

BUS OPERATORS ORGANISATION PALAKKAD, REGISTER NO. CA-281/2007 SN BUILDING, GB ROAD, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.

2.

PALAKKAD JILLA PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS ASSOCIATION REGISTER NO. 609/1993, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.

BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.JAJU BABU BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT :

------------------------ REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY PALAKKAD - 678 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 36064 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 2.11.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 28.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 21.8.2015 IN WP(C) NO. 26085/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXT.P4 COPY OF ORDER NO. G/7000/2015/E. DATED 17.8.2015 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM.

EXT.P5 COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO. G1/4751/2014/P DATED 6.11.2015 OF THE MEETING OF THE RESPONDENT SCHEDULED ON 5.12.2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.36064 of 2015-G --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are aggrieved with the non-consideration of Exts.P1&P2 representations pending before the respondent. The prayer of the petitioners is to direct the respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P1&P2 within a reasonable period. The learned counsel for the petitioners places reliance on Ext.P3 judgment and seeks for a direction to extend similar relief to the petitioners as well.

In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P1&P2 representations of the petitioners in accordance with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court recorded in Ismeth Ummar v. Regional Transport Authority [2010 (4) KLT 597 SC], as expeditiously as possible.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp/30/11/15